Oak Knoll shows what a yellow chip looks like when the downside still matters.
The walkthrough is driven by the seeded Oak Knoll scenario. The page stays honest to the real computation instead of faking the recommendation.
| Purchase price | $540,000 |
| ARV | $990,000 |
| Rehab budget | $80,000 |
| Hold months | 12 months |
| Downside profit | $74,521 |
Valuation
The first read anchors on purchase price, ARV, and max offer range. That frames whether the project even deserves scope refinement.
Scope
Scope is not a narrative exercise. Budget, contingency, and total rehab exposure need to sit in one frame.
User-entered base budget.
Inherited from the selected pack.
Budget plus contingency reserve.
Schedule
A yellow decision often comes from timeline pressure. Oak Knoll is a case where extra hold time matters enough to keep the chip out of green.
Stack
Capital efficiency depends on financing costs, cash in, and the total project stack. Those numbers should be visible without opening another sheet.
| Cash in | $299,382 |
| Debt balance | $405,000 |
| Financing cost | $9,600 |
| Holding cost | $58,088 |
| Selling cost | $73,206 |
Sensitivity
The downside case is where a conditional recommendation earns its label. If the downside still clears, the operator can negotiate instead of guessing.
Conditional
Oak Knoll works as a public sample because the reasons are inspectable. The deal is interesting, but the downside and timeline keep the recommendation from feeling automatic.